Tommy Robinson Thread

Racist violent Nazi thug and the #FreeTommy clowns want this scum released ?
Prison CCTV footage of Tommy Robinson in an 'unprovoked racially aggravated assault'

Rawkuss wrote:

Racist violent Nazi thug and the #FreeTommy clowns want this scum released ?
Prison CCTV footage of Tommy Robinson in an 'unprovoked racially aggravated assault'

https://twitter.com/TheBirmingham6/status/1008141606019588096

Obviously, the tweet includes a video

And here is an article about Tommy attacking somebody else https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/edl-founder-tommy-robinson-filmed-12173898

Rawkuss wrote:

Boofer wrote:Oh, Burrunjor…

As far as your racial classifications go, Caucasian is a broad phenotypic taxon from the 18th Century which often precludes the cultural, haplotypic, social and national racial constructions which contribute to the stratification of racial groups. It’s an incredibly disingenuous and narrow way of presenting race in order to adapt it to your flawed assertion that you cannot be racist towards Muslims. If fact it’s a basis for asserting that you cannot be racist towards anyone in the ‘Caucasoid’ group.

One only has to look to the Rawandan genocide and the ethnic construction of race in such an example to see the fallacious basis of using such limited categorisation. The Bahutu Manifesto is a good example of how genetically very similar people can be lead down a path to perceptual change based on ethnicity that is independent of outdated phenotypical classifications.

Transpose that ideological construction of race to the ‘white British’ perception of race and ethnicity, and it’s highly unlikely most white knuckle-draggers would consider Semitic Arabs to be part of some ‘Caucasian brotherhood’.  They look at the ethnic, physical, cultural and national differences and ‘other’ them. I challenge you to attempt to explain to any of those neolithic thickos that they’re the same race as an Arab. Hell, if you told them they were the same as the French counterparts they’d probably pour a lager over you and kick you in the bollocks.

Scientifically, these broad classifications of race have been disproven by the genetic evidence, leading to many leading geneticists to declare that there is no such thing as race, only different admixtures of haplogroups based on tiny variations in the human genome. Given such knowledge, it’s fair to conclude that any ‘othering’ predicated on culture, appearance or place of origin is a shallow, yet deleterious social construction which we define as racism. Ignoring these factors and using 200 year old classifications as a fig leaf to avoid accusations of racism is tragically wrong.

As for your points about the ‘ideology of Islam’, that phrase in itself contradicts the caveats you cite from your own writings. The fact you treat Islam as a monolithic, unbendingly terroristic instruction manual for fucking up the world also means that - despite your assertions to the contrary - that you believe that the facility for radical behaviour lies within every adherent of the Koran. You go out of your way to avoid the sectarian differences, theological interpretations and the way the faith manifests itself within various nation states and the examples of secular co-existence within the Islamic diaspora. It’s almost as if you treat the ‘good’ Muslims as if they are some anomalous outcome of their mass indoctrination.

There’s also the split-personality code-switching I’ve noticed both Yaxley-Lennon and his supporters doing. If they’re talking to the media they cite ‘radical Islam’ and law-abiding Muslims. Yet when it comes to rallies and public speeches, they talk about the ideology and it’s people as a giant bloc, with some anomalous exceptions who they percieive as ‘victims’ of the religion. I can’t fail to see the spectre of that in your own postings.

Also, I’m afraid I don’t have much time to watch Youtube videos, and don’t really feel they’re a good way of ascertaining truth as they’re basically commentary rather than evidence of anything.  I don’t really think that watching satirical cartoons from a specific political perspective is going to tell me anything factual or salient about this argument. They’re not exactly an intellectual gold standard.

Finsbury Park terror suspect Darren Osborne read messages from Tommy Robinson days before attack, court hears
Prosecutors say Britain First deputy leader Jayda Fransen also sent message to Darren Osborne

Rawkuss wrote:If Islam is a dangerous ideology that causes people to become terrorists then what is this?

Finsbury Park terror suspect Darren Osborne read messages from Tommy Robinson days before attack, court hears
Prosecutors say Britain First deputy leader Jayda Fransen also sent message to Darren Osborne

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-darren-osborne-messages-finsbury-park-attack-mosque-van-latest-court-trial-muslims-a8174086.html

It could be said that paedophilia is an EDL tradition, with former leader Tommy Robinson leading by example. As I’ve mentioned before on numerous occasions, Tommy Robinson’s ex-bodyguard defected to the left through close friends of mine and he told them many personal things about Tommy. One of the things he said was that Tommy Robinson and some friends of his got a 15 year old girl from Dunstable, coked up and drunk after an EDL demo. Tommy and his friends then gang banged the poor girl in a drink and cocaine fuelled session of child rape. Apparently the poor girl was in a terrible state when the ex-bodyguard drove her home.

Rawkuss wrote: