And THIS is the very problem with them, because of the ludicrous Daily Mail backlash they stupidly assume that everyone who opposes the regeneration-retcon casting are white racist misogynists - I wouldn't personally give a fuck about a black or asian guy being cast in the role provided they were quirky and entertaining, because it wouldn't conflict with canon - we know there are regional physical variations between the Doctors and skin colour is really cosmetically no different to eye or hair colour.
I also have no problem with a black guy in the role in principle. As you say his skin color is completely and utterly irrelevant, and there are two actors off the top of my head that I think would make amazing Doctors.
Adrian Lester would be a dynamic, Pertwee style Doctor, whilst Paterson Joseph based on his performance in Peep Show could be a brilliant crazy Tom Baker style Doctor.
However there is one problem with a black Doctor. He couldn't go to a lot of the places a white man could in the past and take charge as easily because of racist attitudes.
To be fair I think you are kind of between a rock and a hard place with that. On the one hand if you just ignore the prejudices that's bad as it makes it look like it didn't happen. However if you wallow in them it can get too preachy.
Of course a good writer like Ben Aaronivitch is able to get round them quite well like in Remembrance but the New Who lot? Check out Thin Ice, which actually manages to give us the worst of both worlds. On the one hand they make out the racism of the past didn't happen with "white washing", line yet on the other they wallow in it with the cringey bit when the Doctor punches the racist.
So yeah a black Doctor with the current production team would be utter shit. Then again they've fucked up their white Doctors too LOL, so I suppose it doesn't matter.
I couldn't care less if they wrote in a female lead in the series(maybe had the Doctor go mysteriously missing and Romana go search for him for several seasons in a huge arc),
Yes that would have been much better. Though I would still have loved a Romana spin off. In the 90's I always loved it the way we had two similar shows, but one from a male perspective and one from a female perspective, Xena and Buffy, Angel and Hercules.
Why not do that with the Doctor and Romana? The fact that they chose Class to be their spin off rather than a Romana one is ridiculous.
but I do have a huge problem with them retconning something in the series in the last 3 years and then expecting us who have grown up with the show over decades to just accept it like simpletons when we full well know that it conflicts with what has been firmly established within the Classic Series.
Yes TBH again I think that's what 99 percent of people's problems are with it. The OH MY GOD A WIMMINZ IS THE LEAD attitude is so non existent.
Personally I would have no problem to a female Doctor or Master if it made sense. Whilst I can't see any story reason for a female Doctor to work (outside of an unintetional body swap) Sadly I actually think they could have done a good story with a female Master.
I would have had it that the time lords had enough power left to send one of their own into the universe to help the Doctor find and free them. They'd obviously choose Romana, but the Master who was on his last legs after the botched regeneration in End of Time would find a way to take her over like he did to Bruce.
The Master in Romana's body would then try and kill the Doctor to stop him from freeing the Time Lords. He wouldn't snog the Doctor, but he would use the fact that the Doctor couldn't kill him without killing Romana to torture the Doctor
At the end the Doctor would find a way to remove the Masters consciousness, which would then take over someone else, (preferrably someone played by either Robert Carlyle or Simon Templeman.)
Romana would then join the Doctor until they freed Gallifrey, after which she would get her own series, eliminating the need for a female Doctor or Master and giving young girls a hero to look up to if that is so important. What's wrong with that?