Which writers for New Who do you think actually did a decent job for the series?
I'm going to say.
Toby Whitehouse: His stories could be entertaining. I never saw a truly terrible story from him. He tended to repeat the same idea though, of aliens being responsible for myths.
Helen Raynor I don't get why she is so hated? I mean WTF. Daleks in Manhattan/Evolution of the Daleks is an interesting, fun story, that has a good atmosphere. The only things that let it down IMO are a poor design for Sec and typical New Who shit of making the Doctor mope about Rose, Martha mope about the Doctor not fancying her (IS HE FUCKING INSANE!) and the Doctor being too shout "KILL ME IF IT WILL STOP YOU ATTACKING THESE PEOPLE!"
None of that was her fault however. I also really liked her Sontaran two parter. Again the only bad things in it were typical of New Who crap, like the Doctors anti gun remarks etc, which isn't Helen's fault.
Phil Ford: Okay two of his stories were co-written, but still I'm inclined to believe the good parts were down to him as he did a better job showrunning the Sarah Jane Adventures than either of them did with Dogturd Poo.
Jamie Matheison: His season 8 story was the best story of season 8, (though that;s VERY slim pickings indeed.) Still that one story shits on most of New Who's attempts. Again there are some faults with it, but only in general New Who terms, like Clara and Danny.
Mark Gattis: Controversial opinion I know, but I actually don't mind a lot of his stories.
Cold War was one of the better stories to feature an old enemy in New Who, The Crimson Horror was a fun run around, Victory of the Daleks is nowhere near as bad as people make out IMO, and his second Ice Warrior one was enjoyable, as was The Unquiet Dead. His only real dud is the Idiots Lantern (which is AWFUL) and the season 9 story Sleep No More. Again though it baffles me that Sleep No More is quite so hated considering its no where near the worst story in season 9.
I'm going to say.
Toby Whitehouse: His stories could be entertaining. I never saw a truly terrible story from him. He tended to repeat the same idea though, of aliens being responsible for myths.
Helen Raynor I don't get why she is so hated? I mean WTF. Daleks in Manhattan/Evolution of the Daleks is an interesting, fun story, that has a good atmosphere. The only things that let it down IMO are a poor design for Sec and typical New Who shit of making the Doctor mope about Rose, Martha mope about the Doctor not fancying her (IS HE FUCKING INSANE!) and the Doctor being too shout "KILL ME IF IT WILL STOP YOU ATTACKING THESE PEOPLE!"
None of that was her fault however. I also really liked her Sontaran two parter. Again the only bad things in it were typical of New Who crap, like the Doctors anti gun remarks etc, which isn't Helen's fault.
Phil Ford: Okay two of his stories were co-written, but still I'm inclined to believe the good parts were down to him as he did a better job showrunning the Sarah Jane Adventures than either of them did with Dogturd Poo.
Jamie Matheison: His season 8 story was the best story of season 8, (though that;s VERY slim pickings indeed.) Still that one story shits on most of New Who's attempts. Again there are some faults with it, but only in general New Who terms, like Clara and Danny.
Mark Gattis: Controversial opinion I know, but I actually don't mind a lot of his stories.
Cold War was one of the better stories to feature an old enemy in New Who, The Crimson Horror was a fun run around, Victory of the Daleks is nowhere near as bad as people make out IMO, and his second Ice Warrior one was enjoyable, as was The Unquiet Dead. His only real dud is the Idiots Lantern (which is AWFUL) and the season 9 story Sleep No More. Again though it baffles me that Sleep No More is quite so hated considering its no where near the worst story in season 9.