From watching the (ahem) Leisure Hive DVD special feature "A New Beginning" it was pretty clear there was a clear goal from the start from JNT and his team to make some fundamental changes and quickly get away from the style and tone of the previous era.
Namely that the show had gotten too comical, and the 4th Doctor-Romana-K9 dynamic seemed too assured to be able to wade through adventures, practically unaffected.
The attitude infact seemed to be that the previous regime was such a disaster or had so cheapened and damaged the show's public image, that it had been necessary to start again almost from scratch.
I should say in the interests of fairness that judging from DWM interviews with Bidmead, it was also largely the BBC and Barry Letts who encouraged this attitude of wanting to make the show serious business again, so some of it at least seemed done by BBC instruction.
I had my issues with this backlash, of course. I very much liked City of Death. I didn't like The Leisure Hive. I don't think any of the new Season 18 companions were that likable, let alone a worthy replacement for Romana. And I do think unfortunately this notion of having to start from scratch is unfortunately where Ian Levine (probably the last person you should want to be made part of the new foundations) seemed to be trusted to have his suggestions and pointers for what would please fans like him be taken seriously.
I think the show should take itself somewhat seriously, as that's what gives the show a certain reverence. One of the great things about Genesis of the Daleks and Planet of Evil is that even when Tom is being the comedian, there is a real unnerving horror atmosphere where you almost can't trust the levity.
It was nice in some ways for the show to get back to that in stories like State of Decay, Enlightenment, The Five Doctors and Revelation of the Daleks.
However I do think the Davison era sometimes took itself too seriously to the point of being downright obnoxious, and making its heroes come off as even berzerk at times. A lot of truth can be said in jest, but taking out a lot of the jest removes a lot of the nuance, and so much of the era seemed very painfully nuance-free and po-faced.
In any case a story like Robots of Death is considered a classic to many fans, but by the more serious standards of the new regime it wouldn't have passed, even though a fair share of nadirs did.
But all that's ahead.
How true was it that the show was in trouble the year before and in need of a revamp? For that matter, what do you believe really would've happened if things had carried on as normal?
Were the changes of Season 18 right, or were they too much too soon? Were you glad to see the old style go or did the baby get thrown out with the bathwater for you?
Namely that the show had gotten too comical, and the 4th Doctor-Romana-K9 dynamic seemed too assured to be able to wade through adventures, practically unaffected.
The attitude infact seemed to be that the previous regime was such a disaster or had so cheapened and damaged the show's public image, that it had been necessary to start again almost from scratch.
I should say in the interests of fairness that judging from DWM interviews with Bidmead, it was also largely the BBC and Barry Letts who encouraged this attitude of wanting to make the show serious business again, so some of it at least seemed done by BBC instruction.
I had my issues with this backlash, of course. I very much liked City of Death. I didn't like The Leisure Hive. I don't think any of the new Season 18 companions were that likable, let alone a worthy replacement for Romana. And I do think unfortunately this notion of having to start from scratch is unfortunately where Ian Levine (probably the last person you should want to be made part of the new foundations) seemed to be trusted to have his suggestions and pointers for what would please fans like him be taken seriously.
I think the show should take itself somewhat seriously, as that's what gives the show a certain reverence. One of the great things about Genesis of the Daleks and Planet of Evil is that even when Tom is being the comedian, there is a real unnerving horror atmosphere where you almost can't trust the levity.
It was nice in some ways for the show to get back to that in stories like State of Decay, Enlightenment, The Five Doctors and Revelation of the Daleks.
However I do think the Davison era sometimes took itself too seriously to the point of being downright obnoxious, and making its heroes come off as even berzerk at times. A lot of truth can be said in jest, but taking out a lot of the jest removes a lot of the nuance, and so much of the era seemed very painfully nuance-free and po-faced.
In any case a story like Robots of Death is considered a classic to many fans, but by the more serious standards of the new regime it wouldn't have passed, even though a fair share of nadirs did.
But all that's ahead.
How true was it that the show was in trouble the year before and in need of a revamp? For that matter, what do you believe really would've happened if things had carried on as normal?
Were the changes of Season 18 right, or were they too much too soon? Were you glad to see the old style go or did the baby get thrown out with the bathwater for you?