Leaving aside Jodie who we all know is only there as part of a stupid agenda and thus doesn't count as proper casting.
Out of the 4 guys in New Who which do you think was the most miscast. Its hard to say since they were all mishandled by the material they were given, so what is their fault and what is the fault of the writes is hard to judge.
For instance look at this scene. One of Tennant's worst
He's shouty, weepy, and awful, but would any other actor have been any better with those lines? Imagine Pertwee or Tom having to do that. FFS Tom would throw the script out the window!
However I think in spite of this Tennant and Eccelston were miscast. I hate saying it as I do really like them as actors (and have met Tennant and he is an amazing guy)
I just think that they were too conventional in Tennant's case, and too uncomfortable at being weird in Eccelston's.
Again though the material they were served made any problems they had worse. Like Tennant for instance. His problem is that he is too conventional. So what do they do? Give him constant romance stories, and make him act too human!
When you look at a story like The Next Doctor where Tennant is allowed to play the Doctor as the Doctor he's fine. In The Next Doctor he isn't romantic, has the right sense of humour, isn't being a hypocrite about weapons, is in control of the situation, isn't whining about Rose, and he pulls it off no problem.
He's not quite a born to play it guy like Tom Baker or Jon Pertwee, but he doesn't stick out like he does in say Doomsday with Rose on the beach. Eccelston meanwhile in the short series he had didn't really get any proper Doctorish stories and so I feel I almost can't judge him at all.
Matt and Capaldi I think were both great choices (with Matt being one of the best) but both were obviously let down (Capaldi more than most)
Out of the 4 guys in New Who which do you think was the most miscast. Its hard to say since they were all mishandled by the material they were given, so what is their fault and what is the fault of the writes is hard to judge.
For instance look at this scene. One of Tennant's worst
He's shouty, weepy, and awful, but would any other actor have been any better with those lines? Imagine Pertwee or Tom having to do that. FFS Tom would throw the script out the window!
However I think in spite of this Tennant and Eccelston were miscast. I hate saying it as I do really like them as actors (and have met Tennant and he is an amazing guy)
I just think that they were too conventional in Tennant's case, and too uncomfortable at being weird in Eccelston's.
Again though the material they were served made any problems they had worse. Like Tennant for instance. His problem is that he is too conventional. So what do they do? Give him constant romance stories, and make him act too human!
When you look at a story like The Next Doctor where Tennant is allowed to play the Doctor as the Doctor he's fine. In The Next Doctor he isn't romantic, has the right sense of humour, isn't being a hypocrite about weapons, is in control of the situation, isn't whining about Rose, and he pulls it off no problem.
He's not quite a born to play it guy like Tom Baker or Jon Pertwee, but he doesn't stick out like he does in say Doomsday with Rose on the beach. Eccelston meanwhile in the short series he had didn't really get any proper Doctorish stories and so I feel I almost can't judge him at all.
Matt and Capaldi I think were both great choices (with Matt being one of the best) but both were obviously let down (Capaldi more than most)