In theory....? In practice....? In Inception.....?
What say you?
What say you?
You’ve said it better, more coherently, eloquently and succinctly than I ever could.UncleDeadly wrote:No. A completely pointless, ill-thought out, ill-defined, nebulous red-herring of a macguffin that does nothing but supply the doctor with some retroactive angst and write out the Timelords because Davies, apparently, wanted rid of them (even though he would subsequently bring them back in a completely senseless manner, only to destroy them again five minutes later...)
Really, it made little sense to do this; if Davies didn’t want to write about the Timelords all he had to do was not mention them (hello ian! Running slightly behind you here...) That way you’re not written into a corner, no bridges are burned and the continuity you can take or leave, with future “showrunners” (god, how I loathe that term) free to explore it or not, as they see fit.
As it stands, it was torpid and went nowhere, written out of existence on a whim, like most things in NuWho. It also fundamentally messes with the character of the Doctor as we know him; all of a sudden the renegade who fled his people due to their complacency and pettiness now cries at the mere mention of them and waxes lyrical about the “Burnt orange skies of Gallifrey...” or some such nonsense. Bollocks. Anyone looking for an excuse to view the new series as a non-canonical “re-boot” has their excuse right there at the first hurdle, as far as I’m concerned. The Doctor’s primary motivation is no longer there.
However, as suggested upthread, the only thing worse than writing the Time War is, perversely, unwriting it, as that renders the whole thing even more senseless; we’ve bought into this plot thread, we’ve been told its important, Eccleston’s characterisation is largely informed by it and then along comes Moffat and tells us that its alrght, none of it really happened anyway. Idiotic. I would be willing to bet that was the reason that Eccleston ultimately declined to return; it rendered his version of the character a nonsense. This, of course, necessitated (at least, in Moffat’s mind) the creation of the “War Doctor”; another pointless conceit that means nothing and goes absolutely nowhere.
Want to talk continuity? Want to talk cohesive writing? What the hell does the Time War mean to the 13th Doctor? Absolutely sod all.
As far as I’m concerned, the Time War pretty much functions as a metaphor for the whole of the new series; a lot of sound and fury…you know the rest
New Who wrote: DOCTOR: I'm a Time Lord. I'm the last of the Time Lords. They're all gone. I'm the only survivor. I'm left travelling on my own 'cos there's no one else.
I can understand his grieving over the loss of his whole race- that makes perfect sense to me, and I’ll agree that some instances of corruption are forgivable in the long term. My issue is that there is never a moment during RTD’s era where such forms of corruption are ever referred to in order to create some possible nuance concerning the mechanisms of the Time Lords, as to acknowledge as such could have made the Doctor a more complex character- choosing to put such things behind him in order to preserve the image of the Time Lords regardless of their prior acts, indicative of a character preferring to do ‘the best he could’ regardless of prior petty squabbles, and also a character with flawed perceptions of his people. But they never address this on screen- the Doctor still interprets the Time Lords as ‘wonderful’ prior to the Time War in The End Of Time, which simplifies his view of them considerably and consequently that of the audience. It’s fine to eulogise them, but I wish the series had explored the flaws of his eulogising in some way.Tanmann wrote:I can buy the Doctor being traumatized by the slaughter of his people and his old loved ones because of the Daleks (especially so because he would've likely felt responsible for their deaths given his failure to destroy the Daleks at their inception cost all their lives). Particularly if Romana and Susan were among them.
I can understand him eulogizing them to forget a lot of their problems of corruption (short of the Ravalox business which is the one thing I think he couldn't forgive), and remembering them as a people who, for all their prior indolence, did choose to fight the Daleks to save the universe, and gave their lives and world for that cause.
The problem is I think is it became a heavy-handed catch all explanation for all his angst and impotence (particularly concerning the Master, who frankly I can't help think the Doctor should be far too disgusted survived when so many good Time Lords didn't, to think he should be preserved just for being the only other survivor) with not much of that kind of complex layers or nuance to it, or at least any that was there got smoothed down over time into something more insipid and bullshitted as it went along.
The Hive » NuPoo » NuPoo: The Fathead Years (2005-2010) » Was the Time War actually a good idea or not?
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum