Subway or KFC

Two different types of fast food but which do you prefer?

I’m unsure as to whether cutting off my bollocks would amount to a preferable scenario, but given that I can’t stand either, I’ll vote for the third option.

Bernard Marx wrote:I’ll vote for the third option.

Good boy!

I don't see much wrong with enjoying a Subway sandwich.

KFC has rarely left me feeling good though....

I agree. I've always enjoyed Subway's tasty meatball marinara sub.

That was always my favourite too.

Subway. A relatively healthy option i would have thought. As meat goes chicken is quite low fat and its not covered in fried batter or breadcrumbs. Plus you have a range of salady vegetables you can have in the sandwich, You decide whether or not you want the food drowned in a sauce.

They even do a salad only sandwhich. Its a tad weird in my view - i.e., no meat at all - but whatever floats your boat.

I actually don't eat that much fast food these days. I mostly eat pasta, fish, chicken and chilli now.

KFC, given that I have a bias towards Jamacian Jerk Chicken. Subway is good but the bread can get overly soggy at times. Though, if you want a healthier option, then Subway is easily the better out of the two. Also, my nan's jerk chicken could easily beat KFC's.